In 2013 and 2015, the ECtHR in the famous case of Delfi AS v. Estonia recognised the possibility for a website operator to be liable for the delayed removal of illegal comments of internet users. In this case the ECtHR formulated criteria for a website operator’s liability for damage caused to a third party by its visitor comments. The judgment of 2016 in the case of MTE & Index v. Hungary the ECtHR modified the criteria for a website operator’s liability, interpreting it to the benefit of web managers. This article seeks to reveal the criteria for the liability of a website operator and to draw some general guidance that can be applied in similar cases
Purpose – to analyze the origin of internet intermediaries’ liability for offensive comments
This blog post, nearly five years after the final Delfi judgment (ECtHR Grand Chamber 16 June 2015),...
The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) has delivered a new judgment with regard the liability of...
In 2013 and 2015, the ECtHR in the famous case of Delfi AS v. Estonia recognised the possibility for...
Purpose – The purpose of this study is to investigate a criterion of potential consequences of liabi...
Summary and presentation of judgment ECtHR on liability of online news portal for users' comments
Discusses the ECtHR ruling in Delfi AS v Estonia (64569/09) on the extent to which third party opera...
Purpose – The purpose of this study is to investigate a criterion of potential consequences of liabi...
Internet intermediary liabilities in defamation actions have posed vexing legal problems in the new ...
On 2 February 2016 the European Court of Human Rights decided that a self-regulatory body (Magyar T...
On 16 June 2015 the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights has delivered the long await...
The liability of third parties for the libellous, threatening or offensive statements of others rema...
As the role of the internet becomes bigger in our everyday lives as so does liability of internet se...
On 10 October, in what was seen as a setback for the practice of allowing anonymous comments on webs...
In a case about internet liability for third-party comments, the European Court of Human Rights (ECt...
Purpose – to analyze the origin of internet intermediaries’ liability for offensive comments
This blog post, nearly five years after the final Delfi judgment (ECtHR Grand Chamber 16 June 2015),...
The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) has delivered a new judgment with regard the liability of...
In 2013 and 2015, the ECtHR in the famous case of Delfi AS v. Estonia recognised the possibility for...
Purpose – The purpose of this study is to investigate a criterion of potential consequences of liabi...
Summary and presentation of judgment ECtHR on liability of online news portal for users' comments
Discusses the ECtHR ruling in Delfi AS v Estonia (64569/09) on the extent to which third party opera...
Purpose – The purpose of this study is to investigate a criterion of potential consequences of liabi...
Internet intermediary liabilities in defamation actions have posed vexing legal problems in the new ...
On 2 February 2016 the European Court of Human Rights decided that a self-regulatory body (Magyar T...
On 16 June 2015 the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights has delivered the long await...
The liability of third parties for the libellous, threatening or offensive statements of others rema...
As the role of the internet becomes bigger in our everyday lives as so does liability of internet se...
On 10 October, in what was seen as a setback for the practice of allowing anonymous comments on webs...
In a case about internet liability for third-party comments, the European Court of Human Rights (ECt...
Purpose – to analyze the origin of internet intermediaries’ liability for offensive comments
This blog post, nearly five years after the final Delfi judgment (ECtHR Grand Chamber 16 June 2015),...
The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) has delivered a new judgment with regard the liability of...